The political-social developments in Iran after the events of 1401 (2022–2023) and simultaneously with the intensification of the cross-border threats of 1405 (2026–2027) called the "third imposed war" have marked a fundamental change in the paradigm of collective action, in such a way that the previous model of generational conflict and street protests gives way to the mobilization of identity and patriotic solidarity. The fundamental question is whether this transition has occurred and what consequences it will have for government-Nation relations. In response, two hypotheses are made: first, in the context of external threat, a significant part of the younger generation changes its pattern of action from confrontation to redefining national identity, although this transformation emerges more at the discourse level; and second, the representation crisis is managed by changing the field of competition from street to narrative square. The research, with a descriptive-analytical approach and the use of the method of critical discourse analysis, examined the analysis of official documents, statements and texts produced on social networks in the period 1401-1405)2022–2027). The findings show that the third imposed war, despite economic pressures, has temporarily strengthened national cohesion and dynamics such as "janfda" are the means of changing collective action from protest to support; however, this solidarity is an immediate and timely reaction to the external threat, and if economic crises continue and the demands of the younger generation are ignored, the Social Capital acquired will be analyzed gradually. Finally, intelligent management of the generational gap by changing the field of competition to the narrative arena and redefining national symbols can help reorganize government-Nation relations, but the sustainability of this solidarity depends on institutional accountability, improving livelihood and opening up real dialogue with the younger generation.