Effect of Religiosity on Muslims’ Perceptions of Islamic Advertisement

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Associate Professor, Faculty of Communication, IRIB University

Abstract

Islam has sets of laws, rules, values and norms that ritualistically and symbolically influence both attitude and behavior of Muslim consumers. Therefore Muslims degree of religiosity should moderate their perceptions of advertisements which carry Islamic symbol. To test this moderating effect of religiosity, this experimental study examined the Malaysian Muslims women attitude toward advertisement portraying spokesperson with Islamic symbol of hijab. A total of 120 UPM female undergraduate students participated in four groups of experiment. Participants in each group were exposed to four different advertisements. Three of these advertisements portray a spokesperson without hijab and one advertisement portrays a spokesperson with hijab. Findings revealed that Islamic symbol of hijab significantly influences advertising evaluative efficacy and degree of religiosity positively moderates participants’ attitude toward advertisement, attitude toward brand, and purchase intention. Furthermore, the results revealed that this effect is not contingent upon or interlinked with the type of advertised product.  

Keywords


Advertising Code for Television and Radio, Ministry of Information, Kuala Lumpur,)1990(.
Al-Olayan, F. S., &Karande, K. (2000). "A content analysis of magazine advertisements from the United States and the Arab world".Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 69-82.
Chachua, G., Kucharski, H., Luba , A., Malachowska, K., &Martinovski, B. (2010).The influence of selected aspects of Islam on advertising efforts, from http://nic.hb.se/assets/media/the influence of selected aspects of islam on advertising efforts.pdf
Cho, Chang-Hoan, Jung-Gyo Lee, and Marye Tharp (2001), "Different forced-exposure levels tobanner advertisements", Journal of Advertising Research, 41 (4), 45-56.
De Run, E., Butt, M., Fam, K., & Jong, H. (2010). "Attitudes towards offensive advertising:Malaysian Muslims’ views".Journal of Islamic Marketing, 1(1),25-36.
Dotson, M., & Hyatt, E. (2000). "Religious symbols as peripheral cues in advertising: Areplication of the Elaboration Likelihood Model". Journal of Business Research, 48(1),63-68.
Fam, K., &Grohs, R. (2007). "Cultural values and effective executional techniques in advertising". International Marketing Review, 24(5), 519-538.
Fam, K., Waller, D., &Erdogan, B. (2004). "The influence of religion on attitudes towards theadvertising of controversial products". European Journal of Marketing, 38(5/6), 537-555.
Henley Jr, W. H., Philhours, M., Ranganathan, S. K., & Bush, A. J. (2009)."The effects ofsymbol product relevance and religiosity on consumer perceptions of Christiansymbols in advertising".Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 31(1), 89-103.
Hornikx, J., & O’Keefe, D. (2009). "Adapting Consumer Advertising Appeals to Cultural Values". Communication Yearbook 33, 39.
Kalliny, M., & Gentry, L. (2007). "Cultural values reflected in Arab and American televisionadvertising". Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 29(1), 15-32.
Kamp, E., &MacInnis, D. J. (1995). "Characteristics of Portrayed Emotions in Commercials: When does what is shown in ads affect viewers?" Journal of Advertising Research, 35, 19-28.
Karson, E. J., & Korgaonkar, P. K. (2001). "An experimental investigation of Internet advertising and the elaboration likelihood model". Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 23(2), 53-72
Kulenovi, T. (2006)."A Veil (hijab) as a public symbol of a Muslim woman modern identity".CollegiumAntropologicum, 30(4), 713-718.
Lumpkins, C. Y. (2010). "Sacred symbols as a peripheral cue in health advertisements: An assessment of using religion to appeal to African American women about breastcancer screening". Journal of Media and Religion, 9(4), 181-201.
Michell, P. C. N., & Al-Mossawi, M. (1995). "The Mediating Effect of Religiosity on advertisingeffectiveness". Journal of Marketing Communications, 1(3), 151 – 162.