Seyed Meisam Motahari; Mas'ud Delkhah; Esmae'l Baniardalan; Majid Sarsangi
Volume 16, Issue 30 , December 2015, , Pages 161-184
Abstract
One of the most fundamental problems in today's cinema is a discussion of what is referred to lack of mutual understanding between officials and artists. The record review in Hoze Honari as one of the major determinants of coordination in Iranian cinema, it can be a reference for all those involved in ...
Read More
One of the most fundamental problems in today's cinema is a discussion of what is referred to lack of mutual understanding between officials and artists. The record review in Hoze Honari as one of the major determinants of coordination in Iranian cinema, it can be a reference for all those involved in Iran's cinema and efficient. But what Hoze Honari as a critic the revelation of values in The New Iranian Cinema refers to Debate success in the sacred films as a cinema with special audience and yet have a value. Avini’s theory of cinema of the 60s, has raised him as the "Benchmark Index" of this movement. In this paper with the comparative methods, we scrutinize the sacred defense, with an emphasis on the Avini’s theory in 6 movies chosen from this current artistic movement in Iran. These films are: “Mohajer” [Immigrant] (Hatami Kia, 1989), "Gozargah" [Crossing] (Bahrani, 1986), "Radde Payi bar Shen" [A footprint on the Sand] (Honarmand, 1987), "Chashme Shisheii" [the eye of glass] (Jami, 1995), "Haras" [The Fear] (Bahrani, 1987), “Balami be souye Sahel” [The Boat toward shore] (Mollagholipour, 1985) Results show that Cinematic works produced by Hoze Honari has not Substantial coordination with Avini’s opinions and even contradicts. The films “Mohajer” (Hatami Kia, 1989), "Rade Payi bar Shen" (Honarmand, 1987), and "Chashme Shisheii" (Jami, 1995), are coordinate with Avini’s Point of view. But the films "Gozargah" (Bahrani, 1986), "Haras" (Bahrani, 1987), “Balami be souye Sahel” (Mollagholipour, 1985) were Uncoordinated with the Avini’s opinion.
