Amin Amirhoseiny; Mohammad Reza Borzoioo
Abstract
Removal reasons of liability is circumstance in which the conditions, the person who makes loss is not responsible for compensation. These conditions in civil liability is divided to legitimate defense, rule of law or competent authority, pride, coercion, reluctance and exigency. Forcible strength is ...
Read More
Removal reasons of liability is circumstance in which the conditions, the person who makes loss is not responsible for compensation. These conditions in civil liability is divided to legitimate defense, rule of law or competent authority, pride, coercion, reluctance and exigency. Forcible strength is from the events which totally destroys causality relationship, and therefore does not fit in the discussion of justificatory reasons or exempted conditions, because the causes of Justification, causal relationship between the harmful act and harmful factor is verified. Now the important question is this if mass media harm individuals and attribute the harm to the causes like coercion, exigency based on act and etc. is it possible to ask them for compensation? Therefore due to the above reasons, there is no responsibility for person who makes loss, but it must be admitted that the situation in the area of civil liability of the media is slightly different from what is basically mentioned in civil liability. In this article using the analytical- descriptive method trying answer these question that in Iran‘s legal system what factors can be considered to be the factors which can remove civil liability of mass media? And as an answer to this question the removal causes of civil liability of media is mentioned and described within 7 title including task or legal authority of media, judicial or administrative orders of a superior officer, expressing criticism and constructive comments, coercion and reluctance, urgency Under certain conditions, the act of person against himself, and pride.
