Journal of Culture-Communication Studies

Journal of Culture-Communication Studies

“Ontology of cultural project”, cross-cycle configuration

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Aliakbar Baghaie 1
abasali ghaiyoomi 2
seyed reza salehi Amiri 3
1 .D. candidate in Cultural management and planning, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran
2 Department of Management and Cultural Planning, Faculty of Management and Economics, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Science and Research Branch
3 Associate Professor of Cultural management and planning, Department of Cultural management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
10.22083/jccs.2024.444341.3843
Abstract
The ontology of the cultural project has not been taken seriously among cultural researchers as it deserves. It can be said that part of the wandering of cultural actions is caused by the lack of supporting models for project design and the weakness of the ontological support of the existing models. This research was conducted with the aim of configuring a structure for the ontology of the cultural project, based on the research approach of qualitative content analysis. In the implementation of this strategy, for the stage of data collection from the library method and systematic review, for the stage of data analysis and combination, from the meta-synthesis method, for the implementation of the meta-synthesis method, from the Sandelowski and Barroso model, for the implementation of this model from the coding technique and for the implementation of this technique MAXQDA software tool was used. Among the reviewed models, methods and methodologies, in total, 10 options were selected to perform meta-synthesis. This research believes that the cultural project, only with the action of the executive.  It does not end, but its completion requires action on the part of the audience. This research defines the cultural project in the form of eight main components and six sub-components, which are located on two sides of the performer and the audience. Finally, based on a cyclic narrative of the cultural project, by placing these components in an intersecting rotational process, the ontological structure of the cultural project has been configurated.
Keywords
Ontology
cultural operations
cultural project
meta-synthesis
systematic approach
منابع و مأخذ
بلیکی، نورمن (1389). استراتژی‌های پژوهش اجتماعی. (ترجمه هاشم آقابیگ‌پوری). تهران: نشر جامعه‌شناسان.
جمشیدی، مهدی (1391). هستی‌شناسی فرهنگی آیت الله مرتضی مطهری. فصلنامه علمی نظریه‌های اجتماعی متفکران مسلمان، 2(1)، 141-166. DOI: 10.22059/jstmt.2012.54312
چکلند، پیتر و پولتر، جان (1389). یادگیری برای عمل. ترجمۀ محمدرضا مهرگان و همکاران. تهران: مؤسسه کتاب مهربان نشر.
خالقی، امیرحسین (۱۳۹۱). جستاری بر رویکردهای چندپارادایمی و فراپارادایمی (چند/فراپارادایمی) در مطالعات سازمانی. فرایند مدیریت و توسعه، 25(۲)، ۳۵-۵۱. DOI: 20.1001.1.17350719.1391.25.2.2.3
خسروپناه، عبدالحسین (1389). فلسفه فلسفه اسلامی. تهران: انتشارات پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه اسلامی.
رشاد، علی‌اکبر. (1391). مجموعه دروس فلسفه علوم، فلسفه فرهنگ، هستی‌شناسی فرهنگ. تهران: مدرسه فقاهت. از: https://eshia.ir/feqh/archive/text/rashad/falsafeh_farhang/90/910511
صادقی مقدم، علی اصغر، خاتمی فیروزآبادی، علی و ربانی، یوسف (1390). استفاده از رویکرد ترکیبی SD و SSM برای حل مسائل اجتماعی غیرساختاریافته. مدیریت صنعتی، 3(2)، 55-76. DOI: 20.1001.1.20085885.1390.3.2.4.5
صمدی‌فروشانی، مرضیه و حسین‌زاده، مهناز (1398). فراترکیب پویاشناسی نرم سیستمی (SSDM) چارچوب مداخله سیستمی در حل مسائل پیچیده سازمانی. اولین کنفرانس ملی تفکر سیستمی در عمل.
کرایب، یان (1386). نظریه اجتماعی کلاسیک، ترجمۀ شهناز مسمی‌پرست. تهران: نشر آگه.
محقر، علی، انصاری، منوچهر، صادقی‌مقدم، محمدرضا و میرکاظمی‌مود، محمد (1397). ارائه چارچوبی برای ترکیب روش‌های مدل‌سازی سیستم‌های پیچیده فنی-اجتماعی با استفاده از فراترکیب تفسیری انتقادی. چشم‌انداز مدیریت صنعتی، 8(1)، 9-38.
محمدپور، احمد (1390). طرح‌های تحقیق با روش‌های ترکیبی: اصول پارادایمی و روش‌های فنی. مطالعات اجتماعی ایران، 4(2)، 81-107. DOI: 20.1001.1.20083653.1389.4.2.5.5
مصلح‌شیرازی، علی‌نقی، رعنایی، حبیب‌الله، ایمان، محمدتقی و تاجیک، مهدی (1395). روش‌شناسی سیستمی چندگانه: رویکردی نوین در پژوهش‌های مدیریت. روش‌شناسی علوم انسانی، 22(87)، 7-32.
موسسه مدیریت پروژه پی‌ام‌آی. (1398). راهنمای پیکره دانش مدیریت پروژه، ویرایش ششم. ترجمۀ مهدی ابراهیمی و علی بیاتی و محمدرضا صمیمی. تهران: انتشارات آریانا قلم.
ویلیامز، باب و هاملبرونر، ریچارد. (1393). روش‌های کاربردی در تفکر سیستمی. ترجمۀ عادل آذر و سعید جهانیان. تهران: نشر صفّار.
Bergman, M. M. (2008). Advances in Mixed Methods Research: Theories and Applications. London: Sage Publications.
Blaikie, N. (1993). Approaches to social enquiry. Translated by Aghabigpuri, H. (2010). Tehran: Sociologists Publications. [In Persian]
Checkland, P. & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and Its Use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students. New York: Wiley.
Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1999). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. New York: Wiley.
Checkland, Peter & Poulter, John. (2006). Learning for action: a short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioner, teachers, and students. Translated by Mehregan, M. (2010). Tehran: Mehraban book Publications. [In  Persian]
Craib, I. (1997). Classical social theory. Translated by Mosamaparast, Sh. (2007). Tehran: Agah. [In  Persian]
Daniels, H. (2004). Cultural historical activity theory and professional learning. International Journal of Disability, 51(2). 185-200. DOI: 10.1080/10349120410001687391
Donaldson, L. (1996). For Positivist Organization Theory. London: SAGE.
Donaldson, L. (1998). The Myth of Paradigm Incommensurability in Management Studies: Comments by an Integrationist. Organization, 5(2), 267-272. DOI: 10.1177.135050849852007
Estabrooks, C.A., Field, P.A., & Morse, J. (1994). Aggregating Qualitative Findings: An Approach to Theory Development. Qualitative Health Research, 4, 503 - 511. DOI: 10.1177/104973239400400410
Flood, R. L., & Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. Chichester: Wiley.
Flood, R. L., & Jackson, M. C. (1991). Total systems intervention: a practical face to critical systems thinking. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 4(3), 197-213. DOI:10.1007/BF01059565
Flood, R. L., & Romm, N. R. (1995). Enhancing the process of methodology choice in total systems intervention (TSI) and improving chances of tackling coercion. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 8(4), 377-408. DOI:10.1007/BF02253393
Foot, K. (2014). Cultural-Historical Activity Theory: Exploring a Theory to Inform Practice and Research. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 24(3), 329-347. DOI:10.1080.10911359.2013.831011
Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584-602. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1990.4310758
Hassard, J. (1988). Overcoming Hermeticism in Organization Theory: An Alternative to Paradigm Incommensurability. Human Relations, 41(3), 247-259. DOI: 10.1177/001872678804100304
Howick, S., & Ackermann, F. (2011). Mixing OR methods in practice: Past, present and future directions. European Journal of Operational Research. 215(3). 503-511. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.03.013
Howick, S., Ackermann, F., Walls, L., Quigley, J. L., & Houghton, T. (2017). Learning from mixed OR method practice: the NINES case study. Omega, 69, 70-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2016.08.003
Jackson, M. C. (2003). Systems Thinking: Creative holism for managers. Chichester: Wiley.
Jackson, N., & Carter, P. (1991). In Defence of Paradigm Incommensurability. Organization Studies, 12(1), 109-127. DOI: 10.1177/017084069101200107
Jamshidi, M. (2012). Cultural ontology of "Ayatollah Morteza Motahari". Social theories of Muslim thinkers, 2(1). DOI: 20.1001.1.25385240.1391.2.1.6.1 [In Persian]
Khaleghi, A. H. (2012). Multi Paradigm and Meta Paradigm Approaches in Organization Studies. Management and Development Process. 25(2), 35-51. DOI: 20.1001.1.17350719.1391.25.2.2.3 [In  Persian]
Khosropanah, A. (2010). Philosophy of Islamic philosophy. Tehran: Islamic Culture and Thought Research Institute Publications. [In  Persian]
Kotiadis, K., & Mingers, J. (2006). Combining PSMs with hard OR methods: the philosophical and practical challenges. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(7), 856–867. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602147
Kowalczyk, R. H. (2004). The effectiveness of high-dependency care. In Systems modelling: Theory and practice. Chichester: Wiley.
Maurya, A. (2012). Running Lean: Iterate from Plan A to a Plan That Works. United States: O'Reilly Media.
Midgley, G. (1997). Developing the methodology of TSI: From the oblique use of methods to creative design. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 10(3), 305-319.
Mingers, J. (2001). Multimethodology: Mixing and Matching Methods. In: Mingers, J. & Rosenhead, J. (eds). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited. Chichester: Wiley.
Mingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega, 25(5), 489-509. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00018-2
Mingers, J., & Rosenhead, J. (2004). Problem structuring methods in action. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(3), 530-554. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00056-0
Mohaghar, A., Ansari, M., Sadeghi Moghaddam, M. R., & Mirkazemi Mood, M. (2018). A Framework to Synthesize the Modeling Methods of Socio-Technical Systems using Critical Interpretive Meta-Synthesis. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 8(1), 9-38. [In  Persian]
Mohammadpour, A. (2011). Research designs with mixed methods: paradigmatic principles and technical methods. Iranian Journal of Social Studies, 4 (2), 81-107. DOI: 20.1001.1.20083653.1389.4.2.5.5 [In  Persian]
Mosleh Shirazi, A N, Ranaei, H, Iman, M T & Tajik, M. (2016). Multiple systems methodology: a new approach in management research. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 22(87), 7-32. [In  Persian]
Munro, I., & Mingers, J. (2002). The use of multimethodology in practice: Results of a survey of practitioners. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(4).
Munro, I., & Mingers, J. (2002). The use of multimethodology in practice—results of a survey of practitioners. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(4), 369–378. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601331
Osterwalder, A. (2004). The Business Model Ontology—A Proposition in a Design Science Approach. University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Netherlands: Wiley.
Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent variable. The Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 599-620. DOI:10.2307/258592
Pidd, M. (2004). Bringing it all together. In: Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice. Chichester: Wiley.
Pidd, M. (2004). Complementarity in systems modelling. In Systems modelling. Theory and practice. Chichester: Wiley.
Project Management Institute. (2017). Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)–Sixth Edition. Translated by Ebrahimi, M., Bayati, A., & Samimi, M. R. (2019) Tehran: Aryanaghalam. [In  Persian]
Ramírez, R., Selsky, J. W., & van der Heijden, K. (2008). Business Planning for Turbulent Times: New Methods for Applying Scenarios. UK: Earthscan.
Rashad, A A. (2012). Collection of courses on philosophy of science, philosophy of culture, ontology of culture. Tehran: Jurisprudence School. https://eshia.ir/feqh/archive/text/rashad/falsafeh_farhang/90/910511 [In  Persian]
Rodriguez-Ulloa, R. & Paucar-Caceres, A. (2005). Soft system dynamic methodology (SSDM): Combine soft system methodology (SSM) and system dynamic (SD). Systemic Practice and Action Research, 18(3), 303-334. DOI: 10.1007/s11213-005-4816-7
Sadeghi Moghadam, A. A., Khatami Firozabadi, A., & Rabbani, Y. (2011). Using Combined Method of SD and SSM for Solving Unstructured Social Problems. Industrial Management Journal, 3(2), 55-76. DOI: 20.1001.1.20085885.1390.3.2.4.5 [In  Persian]
Samadiforushani, M., & Hosseinzadeh, M. (2019). Systematic soft dynamics metacomposition (SSDM) is a framework for systemic intervention in solving complex organizational problems. First National Conference on Systems Thinking in Practice. [In  Persian]
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. United States: Springer Publishing Company.
Schultz, M., & Hatch, M. J. (1996). Living with multiple paradigms the case of paradigm interplay in organizational culture studies. Academy of management review, 21(2), 529-557. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1996.9605060221
Sushil. (2018). Flexible Systems Methodology: A Mixed-method/Multi-method Research Approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19(2), 109-110. DOI:10.1007/s40171-018-0190-z
Taket, A., & White, L. (1998). Experience in the practice of one tradition of multimethodology. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11(2), 153-168. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022977301782
Williams, B., & Hummelbrunner, B. (2010). Systems concepts in action: A practitioner's toolkit. Translated by Azar, A. & Jahanian, S. (2014). Tehran: Saffar. [In  Persian]
Willmott, H. (1993). Breaking the Paradigm Mentality. Organization Studies, 14(5), 681-719. DOI: 10.1177/017084069301400504
Wu, P. P. Y., Fookes, C., Pitchforth, J., & Mengersen, K. (2015). A framework for model integration and holistic modelling of socio-technical systems. Decision Support Systems, 71, 14-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2015.01.006
Zlatanović, D. (2017). Multi-Methodological Approach to Complex Problem Solving: The Case of Serbian Enterprise. Systems, 5(2), 40. DOI: 10.3390/systems5020040