General Policy
This journal applies a Double-Blind Peer Review process. All manuscripts must undergo the following steps before publication:
Review Process
- Initial Screening by Editor: Assessment of scope and overall quality.
- Submission to Reviewers: At least two expert reviewers are assigned.
- Scientific Evaluation: Reviewers assess the manuscript for validity, methodology, and ethical standards.
- Authors’ Revisions: Authors are required to revise the manuscript according to reviewers’ comments.
- Final Decision: The editor makes the final decision based on reviewers’ reports.
Review Principles
- Full confidentiality of the review process
- Fair and objective evaluation
- Avoidance of conflicts of interest
- Compliance with ethical publishing standards according to COPE guidelines
Possible Outcomes
- Acceptance without changes
- Acceptance with minor revisions
- Conditional acceptance with major revisions
- Rejection
