Alireza Kermani; Soheila , SadeghiFfassaei
Abstract
The thinkers in the field of childhood and adolescent studies are divided into two general groups, a group that believe in continuity in history, and another group, like Foucault, believes the history is a set of discontinuities. In this article, we aim to find out whether childhood and adolescence is ...
Read More
The thinkers in the field of childhood and adolescent studies are divided into two general groups, a group that believe in continuity in history, and another group, like Foucault, believes the history is a set of discontinuities. In this article, we aim to find out whether childhood and adolescence is a discursive phenomenon. The main objective is the discovery of the main mechanisms of the emergence of childhood in the modern world with the emphasis on the archeology of knowledge. The results indicate: first, Childhood Is a modern and discursive subject, second, Childhood is a discursive-historical phenomenon and three, like other discursive phenomena, Childhood is the product of the exclusion mechanism in the discourse of modernity. According to Foucault’s problematic discourse, we claim that childhood and adolescence are like madness and has a pre-history and post-history. In the pre-history period, we do not have a childhood phenomenon .A child is a modern phenomenon and most likely-under the influence of a variety of media-will disappear in the future.
Iman Erfanmanesh; Soheila Sadeghi Fasaei
Abstract
The social world is the field of multiple discourses in which they are competing over their stabilization of discursive space. The concrete adequacy pertains to potency of discourse in the pattern-making of basic society institutions such as family. After the Islamic revolution, belligerent discourses ...
Read More
The social world is the field of multiple discourses in which they are competing over their stabilization of discursive space. The concrete adequacy pertains to potency of discourse in the pattern-making of basic society institutions such as family. After the Islamic revolution, belligerent discourses have tried to combat discursive stream of the Islamic revolution. In this article, after searching through valid documents and news about women and family among social networks and domestic/international news agencies (62 documents between the year 2012-2015), the pattern of family has been studied from the perspective of DAESH discourse according to CDA and Lacanian discourse analysis in three levels of descriptive, interpretative, and explanative analysis. Some parts of the discursive power of that pattern relate to communications and the virtual space. It seems that DAESH’s family pattern is articulated around the concepts of ‘masculinity’, ‘dominance of collectivism,’ and ‘attention to Salafism and Superficialism doctrines’.
