<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Research Institute of Culture, Art and Communication
Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Culture-Communication Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-8760</Issn>
				<Volume>12</Volume>
				<Issue>16</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Presenting a model for Critical Discourse Analysis of Movies</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Presenting a model for Critical Discourse Analysis of Movies</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>129</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>157</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">3387</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>00</FirstName>
					<LastName>00</LastName>
<Affiliation>00</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>00</FirstName>
					<LastName>00</LastName>
<Affiliation>00</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>04</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The Growth of dominance of images in this era and the dominance of ‘visual culture’, cause analyzing picture as well as visual text to be more important.
The main concern of this paper is to mention the theoretical complexity of the images analysis for presenting a model for critical discourse analysis of movies. In this article we have tried to use the three-dimensional model of Norman Fairclough’s systematic approach. However the tools that Fairclough has introduced are more suitable for written texts not for visual texts. Therefore the social semiotics and the approaches of Rick Iedema, Theo van Leeuwen, Gillian Rose and Gunther Kress have been used and then by merging those with the three-dimensional model of Fairclough, a suitable model for analyzing the movies has been obtained.&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The Growth of dominance of images in this era and the dominance of ‘visual culture’, cause analyzing picture as well as visual text to be more important.
The main concern of this paper is to mention the theoretical complexity of the images analysis for presenting a model for critical discourse analysis of movies. In this article we have tried to use the three-dimensional model of Norman Fairclough’s systematic approach. However the tools that Fairclough has introduced are more suitable for written texts not for visual texts. Therefore the social semiotics and the approaches of Rick Iedema, Theo van Leeuwen, Gillian Rose and Gunther Kress have been used and then by merging those with the three-dimensional model of Fairclough, a suitable model for analyzing the movies has been obtained.&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Critical Discourse Analysis</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">image</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">social semiotics</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">movie.</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.jccs.ir/article_3387_4a11654ad1e1e48352252859ff3032a0.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
