فصلنامه علمی مطالعات فرهنگ - ارتباطات

فصلنامه علمی مطالعات فرهنگ - ارتباطات

ترویج دیپلماسی فرهنگی از طریق مجامع پارلمانی: مطالعه موردی اتحادیه اروپا و امکان‌سنجی آن در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
شهیره نوذری 1
محمدرضا مجیدی 2
1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه مطالعات منطقه‌ای دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران،تهران، ایران. (نویسنده مسئول) Shahireh_nozari@ut.ac.ir
2 دانشیار گروه مطالعات منطقه‌ای، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. mmajidi@ut.ac.ir
10.22083/jccs.2025.494688.4002
چکیده
دیپلماسی فرهنگی از جنبه‌های کلیدی روابط بین‌الملل است که از طریق تسهیل تبادل ایده‌ها، ارزش‌ها و عناصر فرهنگی میان ملت‌ها، درک و همکاری متقابل را ارتقا می‌دهد. در این میان، دیپلماسی پارلمانی از طریق مجامع پارلمانی نقش مهمی در پیشبرد اهداف فرهنگی ایفا می‌کند. این پژوهش باهدف بررسی چگونگی کمک مجامع پارلمانی اتحادیه اروپا به ارتقای دیپلماسی فرهنگی، به تحلیل ابتکاراتی چون جایزه لوکس، سال میراث‌فرهنگی اروپا و همکاری این مجامع با نهادهای فرهنگی بین‌المللی می‌پردازد. برای بررسی این موضوع از نظریات کامینگز، ویسگلاس، دی بوئر و برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل اطلاعات از روش سوآت استفاده شده است. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که مجامع پارلمانی به‌واسطۀ چارچوب‌های ساختاری و مشارکت‌های راهبردی خود، توانسته‌اند بسترهایی برای گفت‌وگوی بینافرهنگی و تقویت قدرت نرم ایجاد کنند. بااین‌حال، چالش‌هایی نظیر محدودیت منابع، مشارکت عمومی محدود و رویکردهای از بالابه‌پایین نیز شناسایی شدند. تحلیل پژوهش بیانگر آن است که دیپلماسی فرهنگی اتحادیه اروپا در تقاطع ابتکارات پارلمانی و دیپلماسی جهانی فرصت‌های قابل‌توجهی برای ارتقای تعاملات فرهنگی و تقویت همکاری بین‌المللی فراهم نموده است. از همین رو، این مطالعه پیشنهاد می‌کند که جمهوری اسلامی ایران با الهام از تجربیات اتحادیه اروپا، چارچوبی منسجم برای بهره‌گیری از ظرفیت دیپلماسی پارلمانی در راستای تقویت و ترویج دیپلماسی فرهنگی تدوین نماید.
کلیدواژه‌ها
دیپلماسی فرهنگی
مجامع پارلمانی
اتحادیه اروپا
قدرت نرم
گفت‌وگوی بینافرهنگی

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Promoting Cultural Diplomacy through Parliamentary Assemblies: A Case Study of the European Union and Its Feasibility in Iran

نویسندگان English

Shahireh Nozari 1
Mohammad Reza Majidi 2
1 PhD candidate in Regional Studies, Faculty of Law and Politics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding author) Email: Shahireh_nozari@ut.ac.ir
2 Associate Professor, Department of Regional Studies, Faculty of Law and Politics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. Email: mmajidi@ut.ac.ir
چکیده English

Introduction: Amidst the expanding significance of cultural diplomacy in international relations, parliamentary assemblies have emerged as critical intermediaries bridging governments, civil societies, and citizens. This study examines the European Union, illustrating how the European Parliament, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, and various inter-parliamentary conferences have effectively harnessed innovative cultural mechanisms—such as the Lux Prize, the European Year of Cultural Heritage, and strategic partnerships with UNESCO and the Goethe-Institut—to foster intercultural dialogue, bolster soft power, and enhance transnational cultural engagement. While these bodies have successfully leveraged established institutional frameworks to institutionalize cultural diplomacy, a SWOT analysis indicates that even these models encounter significant challenges, including financial constraints, limited public participation, and top-down approaches, thereby necessitating a critical re-evaluation of their transferability. Consequently, the primary objectives of this research are to scrutinize the role of EU parliamentary assemblies in promoting and implementing cultural diplomacy, to identify key initiatives that have advanced cultural understanding and cooperation among member states and external partners, to analyze the challenges and opportunities inherent in these parliamentary bodies’ diplomatic efforts, and to propose actionable strategies for adapting European experiences to the specific realities of the Islamic Republic of Iran, thereby leveraging parliamentary assemblies to advance cultural diplomacy within the Iranian context.
Method: Methodologically, the study adopts a qualitative case study approach grounded in the theoretical frameworks of Cummings (2003) and Visglaas & De Boer (2007), with a temporal scope extending from the early 21st century to the present. Data collection is conducted through systematic document analysis of academic literature, government reports, policy documents, diplomatic speeches, parliamentary records, and inter-parliamentary meeting minutes. Additionally, a SWOT analysis is employed as a strategic planning instrument to evaluate the internal and external factors influencing the efficacy of cultural diplomacy strategies in both the EU and Iran.
Findings: The study reveals fundamental institutional differences between Iran and the European Union that necessitate careful adaptation of European experiences. Structural differences are evident, as decision-making power in Iran regarding foreign and cultural policy is heavily concentrated within executive and security bodies, significantly limiting the legislative branch’s role. In contrast, the EU’s decentralized, multi-layered structure actively empowers the European Parliament and related bodies in formulating and executing external cultural policies. Furthermore, a significant gap exists between the organized, active role of European civil society and citizens in cultural policy-making versus the situation in Iran. Financial and institutional constraints also pose challenges; the heavy reliance on state budgets, limited financial resources, and a lack of institutional independence hinder the institutionalization of parliamentary-led cultural diplomacy in Iran. Additionally, the absence of a cohesive party system in the Iranian Parliament, compared to the active party structures in the EU, negatively impacts the coherence and sustainability of long-term cultural programs. A feasibility analysis suggests that Iran’s centralized decision-making apparatus, the absence of a responsive party system, and deficient strategic planning render effective parliamentary cultural diplomacy more arduous than in the European model. Consequently, the lack of a comprehensive institutional framework and the predominantly symbolic character of existing parliamentary friendship groups have resulted in the underutilization of the Iranian Parliament’s potential for international cultural engagement. Nevertheless, the European experience provides valuable insights. Shared cultural and diplomatic foundations facilitate targeted, localized adaptation. Iran holds significant potential to harness cultural diplomacy as a soft power instrument, underpinned by its ancient civilization, rich cultural diversity, and multifaceted ethnic, religious, and linguistic composition. These assets offer a robust foundation for fostering regional and international cultural interactions through strategic parliamentary initiatives.
Conclusion: Notwithstanding institutional disparities, shared cultural and diplomatic foundations facilitate the targeted, localized adaptation of European parliamentary models. In light of recent challenges to Iran’s international image, the Parliament is uniquely positioned to reconstruct the nation’s global identity and advance indigenous cultural narratives, thereby transitioning foreign policy from state-centric exclusivity toward a people-centered paradigm. To achieve this, four strategic recommendations are proposed: first, formulating a comprehensive “Parliamentary Cultural Diplomacy Strategy” through collaboration among the Islamic Consultative Assembly, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Organization for Islamic Culture and Relations, and academic institutions; second, establishing specialized cultural working groups within parliamentary committees to facilitate cooperation with aligned nations through joint initiatives and cultural memorandums of understanding; third, capacity building and strategic resource allocation, including specialized training for MPs on cultural diplomacy, dedicated budgets for cultural exchange projects, modern communication technologies, and increased participation in regional parliamentary assemblies; and fourth, developing a localized model of Iranian parliamentary cultural diplomacy based on creative adaptation rather than direct replication, aligning international best practices with local cultural, political, and institutional contexts. In conclusion, by adopting European experiences through a critical, comparative lens rather than mere imitation, Iran can harness parliamentary cultural diplomacy as a novel instrument to augment soft power, reconstruct its international image, and foster more effective global engagement.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Cultural diplomacy
parliamentary assemblies
European Union
soft power
intercultural dialogue
ارحامی، اسیه، محسنیان، سیدعلی، مستمع، رضا، مرادی، مهدی، طلایی شکری، شهاب و اسماعیل نوده فراهانی (1399). کمیسیون فرهنگی؛ وظایف، اختیارات و اولویت‌های پیشنهادی. تهران، ایران: مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی. 1-111.
 https://sid.ir/paper/804056/fa 
حاجی مینه، رحمت و محمد عابدی (1399). پارلماسی در سیاست خارجی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. رهیافت‌های سیاسی و بین‌المللی، 12(2)، 150-123.
 https://doi.org/10.29252/piaj.2021.211351.0 
دلاورپوراقدم، مصطفی و سیدجلال دهقانی فیروزآبادی (1395). کاستی‌ها و راهکارهای توانمندسازی دیپلماسی پارلمانی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. فصلنامه مجلس و راهبرد، (88)23. 295-324. بازیابی‌شده از 
https://civilica.com/doc/1208680 
صفوی، سیدحمزه، باقری، ابراهیم و یاسرنورعلی‌وند (1397). قدرت هنجاری و دیپلماسی فرهنگی اتحادیه اروپا (کاربست آن در قبال جمهوری اسلامی ایران). مطالعات فرهنگ - ارتباطات، (41)19. 102-77..بازیابی‌شده از
 http://ensani.ir/fa/article/378855
فاطمی صدر، امیرو ناصرحکمت نژاد(1396). دیپلماسی فرهنگی اتحادیۀ اروپا؛ اهداف و چشم‌اندازها. مطالعات روابط فرهنگی بین‌الملل، (5)2، 189-167. بازیابی‌شده از
http:// www.ormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1422186
مرادی، سید مهدیو مجتبی مقصودی(1384). گروه‌های دوستی پارلمانی و نقش آن در سیاست خارجی: مطالعه موردی ایران. مجلس و پژوهش، (48)12. 48-23. بازیابی‌شده از
 http://ensani.ir/fa/article/185587 
مهری پرگو، وجیهه و مهدی امیری(1388). دیپلماسی پارلمانی؛ محورها و رویکردها. گزارش‌های کارشناسی (مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی)، شماره ۹۶۸۶. 1-32. بازیابی‌شده از
 https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1755098
Astor, A., Burchardt, M., & Griera, M. (2019). Polarization and the limits of politicization: Cordoba’s Mosque-Cathedral and the politics of cultural heritage. Qualitative Sociology, 42(3), 337-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-09419-x 
Baschiera, S., & Di Chiara, F. (2018). The European Parliament projecting cultural diversity across Europe: European quality films and the Lux Prize. Journal of European Popular Culture, 9(2), 235-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/17411548.2018.1442619
Bertolin, C. (2019). Preservation of cultural heritage and resources threatened by climate change. Geosciences, 9(6), 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/GEOSCIENCES9060250
Blaney, M. (2012, April 26). Creative Europe comes in for criticism at public hearing in Brussels. Screen Daily. Retrieved December 15, 2024, from https://www.screendaily.com/creative-europe-comes-in-for-criticism-at-public-hearing-in-brussels/5041019.article
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Butler, G. (2015). The Interparliamentary Conference on the CFSP/CSDP: A new forum for the Oireachtas in Irish and EU foreign policy? Irish Studies in International Affairs, 26, 163-186. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/isia.2015.0005
Cammaerts, B., Bruter, M., Banaji, S., Harrison, S., & Anstead, N. (2013). EACEA 2010/03: Youth participation in democratic life, final report. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/youth/policy/youth_strategy/documents/youth-participation-study_en.pdf
Carta, C., & Belfiore, E. (2020). ‘Reaching across the fault lines?’: The role of cultural diplomacy in post-Brexit Europe. In C. Carta & R. Higgott (Eds.), Cultural diplomacy in Europe (pp. 193-215). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21544-6_9
Cofelice, A. (2016). The Parliamentary Assembly of the Mediterranean and its contribution to democracy promotion and crisis management. In S. Stavridis & D. Jančić (Eds.), Parliamentary diplomacy in European and global governance (pp. 193-209). Brill.
Colomer, L. (2021). Exploring participatory heritage governance after the EU Faro Convention. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 12(3), 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-03-2021-0041
Conference of Parliamentary Committees for Union Affairs of Parliaments of the European Union (COSAC). (Various years). Biannual reports. Retrieved December 15, 2024, from https://secure.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/conference/cosac/home.do
Council of Europe. (1950). European Convention on Human Rights. Council of Europe.
Council of Europe. (1996). European Social Charter (Revised). Council of Europe Publishing.
Council of Europe. (2005). Convention on the value of cultural heritage for society (Faro Convention). Article 4(c). Retrieved December 1, 2024, from https://www.coe.int/en/web/culture-and-heritage/faro-convention
Council of Europe. (2008). White paper on intercultural dialogue: “Living together as equals in dignity”. Council of Europe Publishing.
Cresswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications. https://revistapsicologia.org/public/formato/cuali2.pdf
Cross, M. K. D. (2021). The challenges ahead for European cultural diplomacy. In R. N. Haar, T. Christiansen, S. Lange, & S. Vanhoonacker (Eds.), The Making of European Security Policy: Between Institutional Dynamics and Global Challenges (pp. 46-62). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003032335-4-5
Culture Solutions. (2020). Composing Trust research report 2019/2020. Retrieved October 7, 2024, from https://www.culturesolutions.eu/publications/composing-trust-2019-2020-research-report2/
Cummings, M. C. (2003). Cultural diplomacy and the United States government: A survey. Cultural Diplomacy Research Series. Americans for the Arts. https://www.americansforthearts.org/by-program/reports-and-data/legislation-policy/naappd/cultural-diplomacy-and-the-united-states-government-a-survey
de Boer, G., & Weisglas, F. (2007). Parliamentary diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2(1), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1163/187119007X180494
Delputte, S., Fasone, C., & Longo, F. (2016). The diplomatic role of the European Parliament’s standing committees, delegations and assemblies: Insights from ACP-EU inter-parliamentary cooperation. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 11(2-3), 161-181. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341338
de Vries, G. (2020). A cultural superpower? The European Union’s venture in cultural diplomacy. In M. Westlake (Ed.), The European Union’s new foreign policy. The European Union in international affairs (pp. 165-183). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48317-3_8
Díaz-González, M. J., & González del Valle-Brena, A. (2020). El cine como embajador de la diversidad cultural europea. Análisis de los largometrajes ganadores del LUX Prize. Fundamenta Journal of Communication, 9(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.14201/fjc.29766
Dragićević Šešić, M., & Rogač Mijatović, L. (2014). Balkan dissonant heritage narratives (and their attractiveness) for tourism. American Journal of Tourism Management, 3(1B), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.5923/s.tourism.201402.02 
Drzemczewski, A., & Lowis, J. (2017). The work of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. In M. Hunt, H. J. Hooper, & P. Yowell (Eds.), Parliaments and human rights: Redressing the democratic deficit (pp. 309-332). Bloomsbury Collections. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474201704.ch-015
Erhami, A., Mohsenian, S. A., Mostame, R., Moradi, M., Talaie Shokri, S., & Noudeh Farahani, E. (2020). Komision-e Farhangi; Vazāyef, Ekhtiyārāt va Olaviyyat-hā-ye Pishnahādi [The Cultural Commission; Duties, Authorities and Proposed Priorities]. Tehran, Iran: Iranian Parliament Research Center. 1-111. https://sid.ir/paper/804056/fa [in Persian]
European Commission. (2011). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing the Creative Europe Programme (COM(2011) 785 final, 2011/0370 (COD)). Brussels, 23 November 2011. Retrieved December 15, 2024, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/com_com(2011)0785_/com_com(2011)0785_en.pdf
European Commission. (2016). New European Cultural Diplomacy Platform launched. Service for Foreign Policy Instruments. https://fpi.ec.europa.eu/news/new-european-cultural-diplomacy-platform-launched-2016-04-01_en 
European Commission. (2016). Creative Europe’s guarantee facility for the cultural and creative sectors. Retrieved December 15, 2024, from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/el/memo_16_2346
European Commission. (2018). The Commission outlines a set of actions to keep cultural heritage high on the political agenda. Press release. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_18_6661
European Commission. (2018). A new European agenda for culture: Communication from the European Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels, 22.5.2018, SWD(2018) 167 final.
Delavarpour Aghdam, M., & Dehghani Firouzabadi, S. J. (2016). Kasti-ha va Rahkar-haye Tavanmand-sazi-ye Diplomacy-e Parlemani-ye Jomhuri-ye Eslami-ye Iran [Shortcomings and Solutions for Empowering Parliamentary Diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran]. Journal of Parliament and Strategy, 23(88), 295-324. Retrieved from https://civilica.com/doc/1208680 [in Persian]
European Commission. (2018). A new agenda for European culture, COM(2018) 267 final. Brussels, May 22. https://ec.europa.eu/culture/document/new-europeanagenda-culture-swd2018-267-final
European Commission. (2018). A new European agenda for culture. European Commission)2024( from
https://ec.europa.eu/culture/policies/strategic-framework/agenda-culture
European External Action Service. (2021). Building peace by cultural heritage - a new EU approach in conflicts and crises. European Union. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/building-peace-cultural-heritage-%E2%80%93-new-eu-approach-conflicts-and-crises_und_fr#:~:text=On%20June%2021%2C%20the%20Foreign,on%20cultural%20heritage%20for%20peace
European Music Council (EMC). (2024). Creative Europe: A most valuable instrument to support cultural diversity and exchange in Europe. Retrieved December 15, 2024, from https://www.emc-imc.org/fileadmin/7_Cultural_Policy/EMC_statements/EMC_Position_Paper_on_Creative_Europe_Sept2024.pdf
European Parliament. (2018). LIX COSAC Plenary meeting in Sofia, 17-19 June 2018. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/afco/dv/59cosac_plenary_sofia_/59cosac_plenary_sofia_en.pdf
European Parliament. (2023). Report on the implementation of the Creative Europe Programme 2021-2027 (2023/2003(INI)). Committee on Culture and Education. Rapporteur: Massimiliano Smeriglio. Retrieved December 15, 2024, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0425_EN.html
European Parliament and Council. (2013). Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) and repealing Decisions No 1718/2006/EC, No 1855/2006/EC and No 1041/2009/EC (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union, L 347, 221-237. Retrieved December 15, 2024, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/1295/oj
Fatemi Sadr, A., & Hekmatnezhad, N. (2017). Diplomacy-e Farhangi-e Ettehadiyeh-ye Orupa; Ahdaf va Cheshmandaz-ha [Cultural Diplomacy of the European Union; Goals and Perspectives]. International Cultural Relations Studies, 2(5), 167-189. Retrieved from http://www.ormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1422186 [in Persian]
Fatorić, S., & Seekamp, E. (2017). Securing the future of cultural heritage by identifying barriers to and strategizing solutions for preservation under changing climate conditions. Sustainability, 9(11), 2143. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU9112143
Fromage, D. (2016). Increasing inter-parliamentary cooperation in the European Union: Current trends and challenges. European Public Law, 22(4), 749-772. https://doi.org/10.54648/euro2016043
Godin, B. (2003). Measuring science: Is there “basic research” without statistics? Social Studies of Science, 42(1), 17-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030420017
Gonzalez del Valle-Brena, A., Díaz-González, M. J., & Fernández-Holgado, J. A. (2024). Contribution of Lux Prize films to European identity: A study from a critical cosmopolitan perspective. methaodos.Social Science Journal, 12(2), m241202a08. https://doi.org/10.17502/mrcs.v12i2.828
Gürel, E., & Tat, M. (2017). SWOT analysis: A theoretical review. Journal of International Social Research, 10(51), 994-1006. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2017.1832
Haji Mineh, R., & Abedi, M. (2020). Parlemasi dar Siasat-e Khareji-ye Jomhuri-ye Eslami-ye Iran [Parliamentarism in the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran]. Political and International Approaches, 12(2), 123-150. https://doi.org/10.29252/piaj.2021.211351.0 [in Persian]
Helms, M. M., & Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT analysis - where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. Journal of Strategy and Management, 3(3), 215-251. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554251011064837
Hiltunen, K., & Lähdesmäki, T. (2024). Report on Young Audience Award. REBOOT Consortium. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202403182476
Hiswara, A., Aziz, A. M., & Pujowati, Y. (2023). Cultural preservation in a globalized world: Strategies for sustaining heritage. West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 1(3), 250-262. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v1i03.250
Holoborodko, O., Gerasymova, E., & Shevchenko, N. (2024). Effectiveness of cultural diplomacy in promoting common EU values. Amazonia Investiga, 13(79), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.79.07.11
Jagielska-Burduk, A., & Stec, P. (2019). Council of Europe cultural heritage and education policy: Preserving identity and searching for a common core? Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 22(1), 157-171. https://doi.org/10.6018/REIFOP.22.1.354641
Joyner, L. M. (2003). Applied research in the pursuit of justice: Creating change in the community and the academy. Social Justice, 30(4), 5-20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29768220
Kandyla, A. (2015). The Creative Europe Programme: Policy-making dynamics and outcomes. In E. Psychogiopoulou (Ed.), Cultural governance and the European Union (pp. 89-107). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137453754_5
Kessler, M.-C. (2020). Cultural Diplomacy. In J. Melissen & T. Rixen (Eds.), Global Diplomacy: An Introduction to Theory and Practice (pp. 230-245). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38638-3_1 
Kostanyan, H., & Vandecasteele, B. (2015). Socializing the Eastern neighbourhood: The European Parliament and the EuroNest Parliamentary Assembly. In S. Stavridis & D. Jancic (Eds.), The European Parliament and its international relations (pp. 220-233). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713984-15
Kreilinger, A. (2018). Interparliamentary Conference on Stability, Economic Coordination and Governance in the European Union (SECG) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Koblenz-Landau]. OPUS. https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4hsog/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/2730/file/KreilingerDissertationPUBLICATION.pdf 
Lähdesmäki, T. (2016). Politics of tangibility, intangibility, and place in the making of a European cultural heritage in EU heritage policy. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22(10), 766-780. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2016.1212386
Lorsch, J. R., Tabak, L. A., & Bertagnolli, M. M. (2024). Point of view: Applied research won’t flourish without basic science. eLife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.102368
Luque, J. M. F. S. (2020). Cultural Diplomacy in the European Union: State and relationship with the EU strategic autonomy (Master’s thesis). Retrieved December 15, 2024, from https://openaccess.uoc.edu/bitstream/10609/146699/1/pperez333FMDP0722report.pdf
Majidi, M. R. (2021). Parliamentary diplomacy: Its evolution and role in international relations. Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs, 12(34), 306-329. https://doi.org/10.22034/irfa.2021.162036
Mark, S. L. (2010). Rethinking cultural diplomacy: The cultural diplomacy of New Zealand, the Canadian Federation and Quebec. Political Science, 62(1), 62-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032318710370466
Mehri Pargo, V., & Amiri, M. (2009). Dipolomasi-ye Parlemani; Mehvar-ha va Ruykard-ha. Gozaresh-ha-ye Karshenasi [Parliamentary Diplomacy; Axes and Approaches. Expert Reports] (Iranian Parliament Research Center), No. 9686, 1-32. Retrieved from https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1755098 [in Persian]
Melissen, J. (2005). Wielding soft power: The new public diplomacy (Vol. 275). Netherlands Institute of International Relations, Clingendael. https://culturaldiplomacy.org/academy/pdf/research/books/soft_power/Wielding_Soft_Power_-_The_New_Public_Diplomacy_-_Jan_Melissen.pdf
Mink, G. (2008). Between reconciliation and the reactivation of past conflicts in Europe: Rethinking social memory paradigms. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 3, 469-490. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-59227
Moradi, S. M., & Maghsoudi, M. (2005). Goruh-haye Dusti-ye Parlemani va Naghsh-e an dar Siyasat-e Khareji: Motale’eh-ye Moredi-ye Iran [Parliamentary Friendship Groups and Their Role in Foreign Policy: A Case Study of Iran]. Parliament and Research, 12(48), 23-48. Retrieved from http://ensani.ir/fa/article/185587 [in Persian]
Neyer, J. (2014). Justified multi-level parliamentarism: Situating national parliaments in the European polity. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 20(1), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2013.871489
Norwine, J. (Ed.). (2014). A world after climate change and culture-shift. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7353-0
Nuttin, X. (2016). Challenges for parliamentary diplomacy in South and South-East Asia and Europe: A practitioner’s perspective. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 11(2-3), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341340
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs.
Nye, J. S., Jr. (2008). Public diplomacy and soft power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699
Orr, S., Richards, J., & Fatorić, S. (2021). Climate change and cultural heritage: A systematic literature review (2016-2020). The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 12(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2021.1957264
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. (2010). Article 7.1.2. of Resolution 1773 (2010) Final version: Promoting parliamentary diplomacy. Standing Committee, acting on behalf of the Assembly. https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=17926&lang=en
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. (2016). National parliaments as guarantors of human rights in Europe. Available at: www.assembly.coe.int/ASP/Doc/XrefViewHTML.asp?FileID=18011&Language=EN. Accessed December 1, 2024. 
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. (2021). Resolution 2382 (2021). Assembly debate on 22 June 2021 (17th sitting) (see Doc. 15308, report of the Committee on Culture, Science, Education and Media, rapporteur: Mr. Roberto Rampi). Text adopted by the Assembly on 22 June 2021 (17th sitting). https://pace.coe.int/en/files/29346/html
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. (2023). Climate change and cultural heritage: Political responses needed. Culture, Science, Education and Media. https://pace.coe.int/en/news/9305/climate-change-and-cultural-heritage-political-responses-needed
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. (2024). Committee on Culture, Science, Education and Media. Retrieved December 1, 2024, from https://pace.coe.int/en/pages/committee-28/committee-on-culture-science-education-and-media
Plamenova Kokinova, I. (2021). The Cultural Diplomacy of the European Union: The Cultural Relations with the People’s Republic of China (Dissertation). Retrieved December 15, 2024, from https://burjcdigital.urjc.es/bitstream/handle/10115/18668/EU%20Cultural%20diplomacy_Ina%20Plamenova_public.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Safavi, S. H., Bagheri, E., & Noorali Vand, Y. (2018). Ghodrat-e Hanjari va Diplomasi-ye Farhangi-ye Ettehadiyeh-ye Orupa (Karbast-e an dar Qebal-e Jomhuri-ye Eslami-ye Iran) [Normative Power and Cultural Diplomacy of the European Union (Its Application towards the Islamic Republic of Iran)]. Culture-Communication Studies, 19(41), 77-102. [in Persian] Retrieved from http://ensani.ir/fa/article/378855 [in Persian]
Sesana, E., Gagnon, A., Bertolin, C., & Hughes, J. (2018). Adapting cultural heritage to climate change risks: Perspectives of cultural heritage experts in Europe. Geosciences, 8(8), 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/GEOSCIENCES8080305
Stavridis, S. (2002). The parliamentary forum of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership: An assessment. Mediterranean Politics, 7(2), 30-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/713869653
Stjernholm, E. (2016). The European Union celebrates culture: The case of the European Parliament Lux Prize. Journal of European Popular Culture, 7(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17411548.2015.1135607
Stivachtis, Y. A. (2023). From national to international actorness: International organizations and the transformation of public diplomacy-The cases of the European Union and NATO. In S. Constantinou, F. Ker-Lindsay, & J. Weiler (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of diplomatic thought and practice in the digital age (pp. 459-481). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28214-0_21
Thiel, M., & Friedman, R. (2012). European identity and culture: Narratives of transnational belonging. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580913
Tiri, E., & Jance, K. (2018). The role of parliamentary diplomacy. Revue Européenne du Droit Social, 1(38), 38-43. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=594402
Vasylenko, O. (2023). The role of culture in preventing conflicts, restoring credibility of international institutions and promoting global peace. In European Parliamentary Assembly (Doc. No. 15678). Council of Europe. https://pace.coe.int/files/32837