هادی خانیکی; Seyede Soraya Mousavi
Abstract
The following article seeks to understand the power relations participating in the discourse formation of Iran's water problem in “Shargh” and “Iran” newspapers. To this end, critical discourse analysis has been applied and 14 samples “Shargh” and “Iran” ...
Read More
The following article seeks to understand the power relations participating in the discourse formation of Iran's water problem in “Shargh” and “Iran” newspapers. To this end, critical discourse analysis has been applied and 14 samples “Shargh” and “Iran” newspapers from 2013/8/3 to 2020/3/19 have been reviewed. According to the findings, some texts of the “Shargh” newspaper were published with the aim of laying the groundwork for implementation of the plans and policies of the 11th and 12th governments programs. In “Iran” newspaper, the role of officials and policy makers in creating the crisis and their responsibility in solving it is invisible. Furthermore, some of the “Iran” newspaper texts indirectly serve to vindicate government’s failure in solving the water crisis and reduce the expectations from the government. In “Iran” newspaper, people are blamed for not participating in solving the problem. In this way, the structures that prevent people's participation are become invisible and people's participation is reduced to saving. “Iran” newspaper portrays the society as a savior and discourages them from changing government policies. Based on the results, the effect of political powers on the formation of the water problem discourse in these newspapers is evident. Furthermore, water issue has become an excuse to make the opposition party appear ineffective, reduce expectations from the 11th and 12th governments, and eliminate responsibility from the governments and parliamentarians.
ghasem misaei; faez dinparast; moslem golestan; mohammad jafari
Abstract
The purpose of this research study is describing the identification of P5+1 group in Iran newspaper in the period between 2003 to 2013. Today, different kinds of media contribute to foreign policy by influencing the public opinion and also shaping the image of different issues in the ...
Read More
The purpose of this research study is describing the identification of P5+1 group in Iran newspaper in the period between 2003 to 2013. Today, different kinds of media contribute to foreign policy by influencing the public opinion and also shaping the image of different issues in the subject. So this paper focuses on the group identity of the P5+1 during the Iranian nuclear negotiation as a matter of public diplomacy in Iranian official newspaper which affiliated to government of Iran. This research study which use content analysis method, shows that the identity in media is flowing and constructed, so the representation of each group of E3, Russia &China, the western group differs from time to time. Using Carl Schmitt’s words, the images represented in terms of enemy and friend.
ghasem misaei; faez dinparast; mohammad jafari; moslem golestan
Abstract
This study considers shown identification of the 5+1 countries related to nuclear negotiations, published in Iran newspaper from 2003 to 2013. During nuclear negotiations beteween Iran and 5+1 countries, west countries have tried to Securitization Iran nuclear plan and accompany with words such as nuclear ...
Read More
This study considers shown identification of the 5+1 countries related to nuclear negotiations, published in Iran newspaper from 2003 to 2013. During nuclear negotiations beteween Iran and 5+1 countries, west countries have tried to Securitization Iran nuclear plan and accompany with words such as nuclear bomb, and have menaced world security by media diplomacy. Therefore the media diplomacy is one of the most important and impressment factors on the new problems and in the special case on the Iran nuclear plan. The research question is introduced in this form: " How characters and materials of the 5+1 member's identification were formed in the Iran newspaper from 2003 to 2013?" This study is based on content analysis. Conclusions show Constructed identity in the international communication and indicate 5+1 member's identification in "friend" and "enemy" groups.